Green Card Strategy for Indian Tech Founders: How to Use the EB-2 NIW as a Bridge to the EB-1A

If you're an Indian tech founder eyeing a U.S. green card, the EB-1A has probably been on your radar for a while.  It requires no employer sponsor, no labor certification, and historically, boasts priority dates that have stayed current when other categories have been backed up for years. For founders building something genuinely novel, it can feel like the obvious path.

But "obvious" isn't the same as "easy,” especially not these days. EB-1A adjudication has gotten noticeably tougher, and Indian applicants are feeling it more than most. As a result, we’re advising many of our Indian founders to consider filing an EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW) first to lock in a priority date, while continuing to build a profile that will eventually support a strong EB-1A. In using this strategy, our clients protect their place in line while strengthening their case for the EB-1A. 

The Pressure Is Real, Not Imagined

EB-1A approval rates have swung sharply over the past two fiscal years. After sitting around 70% in FY2023, the overall approval rate fell to roughly 61% in FY2024 in what was one of the toughest years on record for this category. FY2025 brought a partial rebound into the high 60s and low 70s in some quarters, but it didn't hold: by the second quarter of FY2026, the overall approval rate had dropped again, into the low 40% range. 🤯 

Indian applicants have borne a disproportionate share of that tightening. In FY2025, Indian nationals filed roughly 14,250 EB-1A petitions, with about 6,993 approvals and 1,474 denials among adjudicated cases. In just the first two quarters of FY2026, filings were already over 7,300 but the ratio of approvals to denials had noticeably worsened. Immigration attorneys tracking the trend point to Indian applicants as among the hardest hit by tighter evidentiary standards, particularly in tech and consulting fields. And even if an approval is in the cards, an approved EB-1A doesn't guarantee a quick outcome for Indian nationals since the category remains backlogged.

Layer that on top of the years it typically takes to build a genuinely competitive extraordinary-ability record and it's easy to see why so many founders feel like they're chasing a moving target. 

The Bridge Strategy: File the NIW First, Let the EB-1A Case Mature

Rather than waiting years to build an EB-1A-caliber record before filing anything, qualified founders can file an EB-2 NIW petition earlier, once their venture's impact is demonstrable, even if their profile hasn't yet reached "extraordinary ability" levels.

If that NIW is approved, the priority date it secures is yours to port over to an EB-1A petition once your profile is ready. That means the years you spend growing your company aren't years spent standing still in the queue.  You're building your case and holding your place in line at the same time.

This matters most in the scenario every founder worries about: EB-1A demand outpacing supply and priority dates continuing to retrogress. If that happens after you've already secured an NIW date, you're not starting over; the EB-1A simply becomes an upgrade path rather than your only shot. Of course, there is a trade off.  This strategy means two separate filings with two separate case preparations and two separate fees, which can feel overwhelming for some, but well worth it for others. 

Why Tech Founders Are Often Strong NIW Candidates

The EB-2 NIW is evaluated under the three-part Matter of Dhanasar framework, and tech founders, especially those building in strategically significant areas, often fit it well:

• Substantial merit and national importance: work that matters beyond your own company, such as AI, cybersecurity, semiconductors, biotech, or clean energy.
• A well-positioned founder:  technical background, traction, funding, and a team that show you can actually advance the work.
• Benefit to waiving labor certification:  Why is your work urgent?  Does it create jobs, investment stimulus, and/or impact that the standard labor market process wouldn't adequately capture? 

We've covered the NIW eligibility criteria in more depth in a companion piece. Short version: if your work addresses a real economic need and shows genuine traction, you likely have a stronger NIW case than you'd assume.

How the Priority Date Protects You

Every employment-based category has an annual cap, and when demand from a country exceeds it, the Visa Bulletin's cutoff date moves backward. Only applicants with an earlier priority date can move forward. If you haven't filed anything yet, any future retrogression hits you in full.

But once you've locked in a priority date, it's on record so even if the EB-1A tightens further, you already have a marker in the queue, and that date can carry over when your EB-1A case is ready. In a system where timing is often as decisive as merit, that's not a small advantage.

How Can We Help?

A strategy like this only works when it's built on an honest read of where you stand today, not where you hope to be in two years. That takes understanding both immigration law and how startups actually grow: what counts as traction, what counts as national importance, and what a USCIS officer will find credible.

Compass Visas was founded by a multi-time founder, and our entire team has spent the last six-plus years focused exclusively on founder immigration.  This isn't a side practice for us, it's the only kind of case we handle, so we know exactly what an NIW-to-EB-1A sequence needs to look like. If you're weighing whether the bridge strategy fits where you and your company are right now, we'll be glad to talk through your specific situation.

This article is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration outcomes depend on individual circumstances, and approval rate trends can shift quickly. Consult a qualified immigration attorney before making filing decisions.

‍